• 11/30 9:01pm MW-with all due respect, I was voicing my opinion to the situation as did you. And yes, it is my opinion that Thanksgiving should be a day that you "don't say anything, if you don't have anything good to say" and especially don't accuse anyone publicly if you don't have definite proof. So, after the officer arrived at her house, why didn't JS take herself down to the post office and clear the matter up before pointing fingers? To your own admission, JS states that there was no other witness-obviously there was or we would not be having this discussion. In recounting the story-JS states that the lonely post office worker was tied up with another customer and that was going to take a long time-which is why she made the decision she did. JS was quite verbose in her posting and I am sure that had she asked previously to utilize the facilities, that would have been entered-as a matter of fact, that would have been more reason for her to chastise the postal workers-and obviously would have made her rendition of the events more comprehensible for me. However, instead she chose "tough love"????
    To my recollection there are no windows at the rear of the post office-so to follow JS's theory of the lonely post office worker being the culprit in turning her in, the worker would have to have left her customer to go look in the woods. Now, people's definition of woods could be different, perhaps JS is considering the woods to be the strip of trees between where the cars park and the adjacent lot or the tree in front of the post office-who knows and until he/she answers that, I guess it is anybody's interpretation.
    As far as utilizing a cup is concerned, we would definitely not be having this discussion if that was done, because people would assume that he/she was dumping out coffee into the woods. The child would not have to be embarrassed dropping his pants outdoors, the parent would be showing consideration for the people around. It is called risk management-if it is predictable it is preventable-my kid has to go potty at the drop of a hat=have cup in car. To take it a step further, once the child expressed his need to go to the bathroom, tough love should have gone out the window and JS could have escorted the child out to the car before it became as imminent as he/she let it get. There are times when there is nothing else you can do (ie. on the ski slopes of NH would be an example) but in my humble opinion, this was not and should have not been one of those emergency times. Go to the store and buy a take along potty if the child has a propensity for not being able to wait! I don't really care about all the good uses for urine-I don't want to track any humans urine into my home. I don't really think that comparing dogs to humans is a good analogy because there are solutions for humans to relieve themselves in private, dogs-not so much. Just my opinion.
    My problem with JS' posting is that I could almost guarantee that he/she would not have taken the time to get on Norfolknet on Thanksgiving to "give thanks" to the police for the job they do day in and day out. There must have been one good thing that they have done that has affected her life and yet she chastised them for responding to an incident that she created. It is just disheartenting for me personally that she could not hold off one day. However, perhaps I take the spirit of the holiday too seriously. I will note however, that I did not see too many other postings on Thanksgiving that would have suggested I was the only one taking the spirit of "giving thanks" too seriously. Whether we think someone should have called the police on this does not matter-to the person who did, it is a quality of life issue-they don't want to witness this/any child urinating in public. That is their right-they are a taxpayer-just like the person who has the "barking dog" issue in the neighborhood, or like you with the "defecating" animals on your lawn, or like the neighbors who want speed traps in their neighborhoods instead of asking fellow residents to slow down. Some people do not want to confront their neighbors and therefore call the police. I am all for the face to face discussion, but many aren't and that is what makes the world go round. I will tell you this, if you wanted the police to respond to the homes of the dogs who defecate on your lawn-as long as you knew who they were-they would do it without question and with professionalism-because that is what they would be tasked to do.
    Finally, no one told me this site was only for displaying dissatisfaction with the community as you alluded to. I read people asking advice for banks to utilize or plumbers to call. Perhaps for you, it is a negative sounding board. For me, it is a place I can come and get caught up with the heartbeat of the town and that does not always have to be negative. Again, different strokes for different folks. JS appears blessed to have a child who is healthy with a small bladder being the only issue. Wouldn't it have been inspirational if she had written an entry about how grateful she was for this child being in his/her life and made light of the situation he/she got her into. The incident could have still be relayed, but the bashing of the post office and police (without due cause, just supposition) would not have been included. Tone and tack can make you or break you in life-Just my opinion!!!!
    - HF


    Norfolknet.com
    your community, on-line